Another issue that we discussed at the
Texas Interfaith Advocacy Conference was the voter I.D. law, which will be
a serious impediment to hundreds of voters who do not already have a photo I.D.
Because 80 counties in Texas have no Department of Public Safety, where they
can get an approved State I.D., people in those counties may have to travel 100
miles and over to a DPS office to get an acceptable I.D. And then the I.D. will
be good only for voting; it will not be a valid identification for any
other activity.
Having a voter registration certificate (voter
registration card) is better. This card is available through the voter’s county
Election Administration office—and every county has such an office. This voter registration card can be used as
identification in any situation—so we need to urge people to register to vote
so they will have a widely accepted form of identification.
HOWEVER, as of now the voter must also
have photo identification; a
voter registration certificate alone is not sufficient. One must have a photo
I.D. and the acceptable photo ID’s are:
·
Texas driver license issued by the Texas
Department of Public Safety (DPS)
·
Texas Election Identification Certificate issued
by DPS
·
Texas personal identification card issued by DPS
·
Texas concealed handgun license issued by DPS
·
United States military identification card
containing the person’s photograph
·
United States citizenship certificate containing
the person’s photograph
·
United States passport
If a voter has ONE of these photo I.D.’s, no other
identification is required; however, four of the acceptable photo I.D.’s are
available only through the DPS office—therefore, many, many voters must travel
many miles to get acceptable identification. And, with the exception of the
U.S. citizenship certificate, the identification must be current or have
expired no more than 60 days before being presented for voter qualification at
the polling place.
Another issue with identification is that if a voter has
the voter registration certificate and so must present also a photo I.D., the
names on the two pieces must clearly refer to the same person. So—for
example—if one piece has a woman’s first and maiden name and the
other has her first and married name without reference to the maiden name,
then the judge may refuse to accept the I.D.’s. The woman could still vote a provisional
ballot but not a regular ballot. It will be best if both names are exactly the
same.
The legality of this voter I.D. requirement is still in question, but as of now it is law. As social action advocates, we need to be sure all voters know to be prepared when they next go to the polls.